Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘#RegencyTrivia’

Footmen were, in some ways, the Regency’s splurge. Not that they weren’t necessary. They were in fact extremely necessary to one’s status. However, all male servants were taxed. Therefore, the more male servants one had, the greater the tax. The reason they were a splurge is that they were also the Regency version of eye candy. Men hired for the position of footmen were tall, handsome, fit, and known for a well-turned leg.

Footmen were the only servants, aside from possibly the coachman and outriders, who wore uniforms called livery.

Footmen worked for the butler. Many houses had a 1st footman whose job it was to man the door and attend the master and mistress if the butler was not available and the household had no under-butler. Footmen were used to run errands (running footmen), clean silver, serve at the table, and if a lady wanted tea a footman would bring it. They also assisted maids in moving heavy furniture to clean, carrying tubs or buckets, and opened and closed doors. They were used to carry packages, and follow ladies around shopping or on a stroll in the park. Regency slang for a footman was a fart-catcher, because they walked behind the mistress or master.

#RegencyTrivia #HistoricalRomance #ReadaRegency

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Rounding out the senior servants are valets and lady’s maids (also called dressers and abigails). These personal servants took orders only from their master or mistress.

They were highly trained. They not only dressed the lady or gentleman, but they cared for all the expensive clothing, to include cleaning, mending, and altering the garments. The laundress only washed linens. Therefore, the remainder of the clothing was left to the lady’s maid and valet.

But that wasn’t their only duty. They were responsible to dressing and cutting hair, keeping jewels clean and in good order, sending messages, supervising the cleaning of the lady or gentleman’s bedchambers, packing, serving breakfast or other meals in the bedchamber, and ensuring that everything in the room was just so.

When traveling, the valet and lady’s maid would frequently travel ahead to ensure an inn room was made comfortable for their master or mistress. They would even bring sheets to change the beds. They were the first person a gentleman or lady would see in the morning and the last person at night.

The one thing a valet did not do was tie the gentleman’s cravat. Or if he did, the gentleman would never admit to it.

Read Full Post »

Regency Trivia!!

Today we’ll talk about cooks. Cooks could be men or women. If they were men, they were most likely Frenchmen who came over to England to escape the French revolution. Aristocrats weren’t the only ones targeted, their servants were as well, but that’s another post. Naturally, French cooks were paid more. It appears that few houses in the country had French cooks, but relied on female cooks instead. It would not be unusual for the female cook to remain in the country for the Season while the family hired a French cook in Town.

The cook reported to the mistress. The cook was responsible for making up the weekly menu to be approved by her. If the lady of the house was giving a party, the cook might be responsible for cooking the entire menu. However, for a ball, it is likely that they had caterers. Günter’s, for example, provided ices for many private events. In addition to special events, the cook was responsible for baking all the bread for the family. Although, there were bakeries in Town, many of them used fillers.

The cook was responsible for the scullery maids, and if there was a dairy, he was responsible for that as well. For food stuffs, he coordinated with housekeeper for their purchase. In the country, she/he work closely with the gardener in charge of the homefarm and the greenhouses.

English cooks (almost always female) were known to remain with a family for more than one generation.

Antonin Carmen was the most famous chef of the Regency, and the first celebrity chef. He cooked for Napoleon, the Rothschilds, and the Romanovs. In 1817, he was cooking for the Prince Regent.

Not even Goodreads can recommend any books where cooks take a prominent role.

#RegencyTrivia #HistoricalRomance #ReadaRegency

Read Full Post »

Housekeepers are some of my favorite people. During the Regency, the housekeeper answered directly to the mistress of the house. Housekeepers, as did all Regency servants with the exception of footmen, wore her own clothing. Therefore it was very likely that she would receive cloth or an allowance in her contract.

She supervised all the female staff except the kitchen maids, nurse, and lady’s maid. Her duties included, but were not limited to, maintaining linens, china, stores of household items, having recipes for everything from cleaning products to medicinal items. Making sure the house was clean and well maintained. She also kept the household records. Like the butler, her room was in the cellar. She was the keeper of the keys for the household. If there is not house-steward, she would also be responsible for all domestic expenditures. In coordination with the cook, she was in charge of the purchasing of spices, and other food stores.

I found this list on Goodreads for books in which housekeepers play an important role https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/90885.Better_Homes_Housekeepers_in_Historical_Romance_

#RegencyTrivia #RegencyRomance #ReadaRegency #HistoricalRomance

Read Full Post »

We’ll start with the upper staff. Any house that could afford one had a butler. They greatly added to ones status.

The butler worked directly for the master of the house. In old families, he might have risen from footman to his position. A butler never wore livery. His working grab consisted of a dark jacket, vest, and knee breeches. His linen white, and neckcloth immaculate and simply tied. His shoes would have a good shine.

His employment contract included items such as tea, possibly a suite of clothing a year, days off, and his salary which would be paid on quarter day.

The butler had the following minimum duties: Charge of all indoor male servants, the silver, to include cleaning it. he was responsible for the wine cellar stockage, stocking all other alcoholic beverages. Keeping the records, and pouring. He was in charge of everything to do with the dining room, including the cleaning of the room, and ensuring the linen was clean, and service at meals. Although, tea was not considered a meal during the Regency. Ladies did have tea and the butler served. He was also the gatekeeper to the house. If guests were expected he’d be at the door, but in the case of people obviously not of the gentry, he could deny them entry. He would, of course refuse entry to anyone the master ordered him to. He was also responsible for all of the mail coming into and out of the house.

The butler slept near the room where the silver was stored, usually below stairs. If he married, it would probably be to another servant. There is some evidence to suggest that is was not uncommon for the housekeeper and butler to be married in some households.

I think it was an unwritten rule that a butler never showed what he was feeling.

I don’t know of any books about butlers, but there are many books in which butler play bit parts. Most of Georgette Heyer’s books include a butler as so most of mine. I welcome any recommendations you have.

 

#RegencyTrivia #HistoricalRomance

 

Read Full Post »

Today, let’s discuss Illegitimacy.

Illegitimacy was extremely prevalent during the Regency. As you know, illegitimacy occured when the parents were not married.

But wait, it’s more complicated than that. A child not of the marriage would be considered a child of the marriage if the husband did not immediately object. If, for example, a husband discovered a wife was pregnant and knew it was not his. He would most likely send her away to have the child and force her to give it up. That happened to the Duchess of Devonshire (Georgiana).

But some husband’s didn’t. Her name escapes me, but it was said that one peeress had a different father for each of her children. Her husband accepted them all.

When a child was accepted, or the husband didn’t know it wasn’t his child, the child was legitimate. This was the law almost everywhere until the very late 20th century. In these cases, a son could inherit a title, sons and daughters could inherit property, and NO ONE had the right to challenge their legitimacy. Therefore, for legal purposes, they were fully legitimate.

But what about the poor children whose father was married to someone else or did not, for whatever reason, wed the mother? Sons could not inherit a title. But sons and daughters could inherit property if the father or mother left it to them in a will. It would be treated like any other bequest.

In the best of all worlds, absent legitimacy, the father would acknowledge the child, provide for him or her financially, educationally, and socially. In some cases raising them with their legitimate children. In that case, the father was most likely to petition for guardianship of the child. That was important, because an illegitimate child who did not have a court appointed guardian was deemed to have no guardian, making it impossible to wed by a special or regular license before the age of twenty-one. Naturally, they could marry by having the banns called before they reached their majority.

Also, illegitimacy in England, particularly among the ton, was not the stigma it was in the United States. During the Victorian period, one woman, from the US who was in England trying to marry off her daughter to a peer, was shocked to discover that illegitimate children of the ton were as accepted as legitimate children.

#RegencyTrivia #HistoricalRomance

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: